Wednesday, December 29, 2010

What's in a name.

Choosing Names

I have recently been asked how on earth I choose names for all of my characters.  I don't think the person who asked that question realized how complicated the ensuing answer would be.  (Partly because most of my names are not on Earth anyway.)   The common perception is that choosing names for characters is something akin to parents choosing names for their children; they deliberate over it for months, lose sleep, toss and turn, repeat them aloud in the mirror, or even get downright fanatical.  In actuality, it has nothing to do with any of that.

Good writers like to pick original names for their characters.  Better writers recognize that there are different classes, or sounds, in names, and maintain this distinction amongst their characters to perpetuate a real and complex feel to the world they have created.  (All the characters from Country A have soft, flowing names, while all the characters from Country B have harsh names you can’t say without spitting.)

The other thing to take into account is appearance.  Since people will read the book, they will be looking at the name.  Especially when you’re making up names, it’s important that the name be aesthetically pleasing as well as pleasing to the ear.

Does that sound complicating?  If you answered yes, then you're probably not one of the lucky few who can perpetually generate original, striking, and endearing names.  Since that leaves the "like me" category, you might find some of the following methods useful. 

The language trick:

It has always been said that speaking another language has its advantages.  For example, Spanish speakers probably get a big kick out of calling people names in Spanish while on their vacation in Germany.  If you do know another language, or if you have access to Google Translator, then your life just became much simpler.  Think of a character, and then think of a word that fits him.  Find the translation of the word.  Maybe all of it, or a part of it will give you an idea or a sound.

The last step is to shake it up a little.  Once, when thinking of a name for a city built into a cliff, I got the Portuguese word pedra.  From this came the city Pedralia. 

The insert random letter into random spot trick:

This one was J.R.R. Tolken's favorite.  Contemplate, if you will, Sauron and Sarumon.  Or maybe Eowyn and Arwyn. Taking the liberty to "mess around" often proves that good names do come by happenstance.

The miss-spelling trick:

Sometimes you can get a classic name for a main character by preserving the sound of a common name, but by murdering the spelling.  It has often been said that good names should break at least three grammatical rules.  Cade could become Kaed.  Of the two, which would you put as the tuff guy? 

The mumble incoherently trick:

When all else fails, it is sometimes necessary to resort to muttering random variations of vowels and consonants under one’s breath.  Caution:  Do not do where other people can hear you.  This practice led many early writers to be burned at the stake for witchcraft when they weren't careful to isolate themselves.  One might say, "Orannor.  Thorannor.  Thoranic.  Oraneal.  Uranus…no, that's a planet.  Uriald.  Uru Ladron, the shopkeeper!  Excellent!"

The type unintelligibly trick:

This method consists of simply typing the biggest load of nonsense this side of Washington, DC.  (Make sure to use lots of vowels.)  Note:  This technique should only be used for heavy fantasy or sci-fi.

Slkkwidenelenaldidkneidnaleidkenidnelttaleentlshthantoraliegigneelddneedonien

Now, take it apart bit by bit.  The average person would see gibberish, but the open mind will see so much more of the same!

 Slkkwidenelenaldidkneidnaleidkenidnelttaleentlshthantoraliegigneeld

Skiden, Widen, Nelena, Denel, etc.

ldidkneidnaleidkenidnelttaleentlshthantoraliegigneelddneedoniendoeit

Aleen, Hthan, Shaleen, Leig, Donien, Toralie, etc.


The connotation trick:

The idea is to pick names that will remind people of similar words, this hotwiring their own emotions and personal associations.  Darth Vader, to me, reminds me of Dark, and Invader.  Luke Skywalker, on the other hand, makes me think of happy people dancing in the clouds.  Beyond that, it's just a cool sounding name!

The point of all this is that good characters need good names.  The right combination of the two will stick in people's minds and endear the characters to them throughout the ages; Harry Potter, Edward and Bella….

(Scratch the last two!  Harry Potter was good though.)  You know what I mean!

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Dialogue Techniques - Issue One

"You don't know what the crap you're talking about!"
"Oh yeah? Well at least I can eat a meal without offending the emperor of a rival kingdom!"

Let's face it, dialogue is awesome. Simple interchanges can bespeak volumes into the story's history and its characters, their tension, progression, and shortcomings. It can develop a likable, memorable character, and transmit emotion perhaps better than any other single strand in the writer's loom.

But, how I you know when the dialogue is good? If it just lacks momentum what can be done to fix it and transform it into a fast-paced, character-building, envy-inspiring weapon of power? Don't get your hopes up. If I knew a surefire answer to that, it wouldn't be on this FREE blog.

However, there are definitely man roots branching off dialogue's tree. And, like a tree, it would be very tiring to try and dig up and examine all the roots at once. Today, let's look a classic pet peeve, tags. (i.e. "he said," "she said.") What are tags good for? They develop a consistent tone, and when done right, can avoid attention. Don't get me wrong, occasionally using a tag to describe a characters facial reaction, voice tone, or more importantly, sub-surface emotions, can be very effective. But, take the following example:

Example:  "I don't think anyone is coming through that door," John said.

Hmmm, you think, I want that to be a bit more humorous. Let's revise.

Humorous: "I don't think anyone is coming through that door," John laughed.


No, you say, I should have stuck with suspense!

Suspenseful: "I don't think anyone is coming through that door," John whispered, whitened knuckles gripping a crow-bar.

No, you say, I wasn't thinking radical enough! Romance!

Romantic: "I don't think anyone is coming through that door," John winked reassuringly.

If you want to go for a different tone in dialogue, try actually changing the DIALOGUE. You'll notice I varied the tag types. The “humorous” example indicates the way he said it, the “suspenseful” example indicates the manner he spoke as well as a follow up action to paint the scene more intricately, and the “romantic” example is a parallel verb—it doesn't have to do with the manner he spoke, but by the wink we are left to infer his tone of voice.

Did the mood change? It did. Did the scene it painted change? I believe it did.  But an entire book filled with unspecific dialogue and exciting, intricate tags can get burdensome. Give me another chance, and I'll try to redeem myself

Comedy: "How far do you think it'll throw him when he steps on the mat?" John asked.

Suspense: "Don't focus on just one point of entry," John said, "They won't use the doors."

Romance: ... (Yeah, I think I'll pass.)

Dialogue, in this manner, will not become as boring or as tedious. You'll notice I used nothing but the simplest tags. After writing dialogue that can stand for itself, feel free to spruce up the tags with taste and purpose.

Just for fun, I'll finish the first example.

“How far do you think it'll throw him when he steps on the mat?” John asked, grunting as he coiled the giant spring on his salesman-repelling device.

I'll just ask it: Who wouldn't like to meet John after that?

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Creating Creativity

Creating Creativity

Perhaps one of the most frustrating elements of creative writing is creating creativity. If you’ve ever tried, you know what I’m talking about. More than one entire class has been devoted to nothing but helping the eager young minds spark or stimulate their creativity. These classes, of course, don’t work. There’s nothing that really stifles creativity worse than a classroom, after all. (But you will hear lots of the standardized methods such as, “Go to a thrift store and find a pair of shoes. Now, imagine the type of person who used those shoes.” Or, another jaw-dropper, “Make a little square with your fingers and look through it at something. Imagine what you’re seeing is a world…”)

The ironic part is, the stimulating part is easy! There are a wide variety of illegal hallucinogens that make the creation of twisted, abstract ideas more than second nature. (Don’t believe me? Just look where it got Edgar Allan Poe!) However, most of the writing world views this as cheating - something more offensive to the writing process than using cheat codes is to video gaming.

So that means you’ll have to rely on a very un-stimulated mind to create your creativity. When that doesn’t work well, it also means more un-stimulating classes will follow.

Over the vast expanse of history, nearly every possible form of creativity has been used to spark creativity. Early in the history of writing (I believe it was sometime back when cavemen ruled the caves) these methods were more primitive. Reading didn’t work (they didn’t yet have a written language), beating each other with clubs had the opposite effect, and putting poisonous spiders in the “girls” part of the cave proved too dangerous. Especially once the girls caught up with the creative individual.

For them, the world-altering, history-changing, mankind-evolving stroke came with the invention of fire. No doubt, they danced around it, worshiped it, and more than once, caught their hair on fire when trying to drink it. This strange, but ultimate breakthrough obviously is what so captured their imagination, and so inspired their minds, that they began to draw stick-figures dancing around fires on the walls of nearly every cave. (Let’s not contemplate about where we would be had they not undergone this evolutionary breakthrough.)

The point is, they had fire! They had something to obsess over. It caught every faculty of their imagination (all four of them) and encouraged them to express it through creation. And I doubt you can argue that since the cavemen, no one has been able to write on cave walls in the same manner.

So we can conclude that the creative feel of a story doesn’t come from the rarity of its use, as much it does from the fire burning inside the author. The point at which an idea truly becomes unique and authoritative, is when it penetrates so deeply into the author that it meshes with his feelings and messes with his perception of reality. At this point, the story will begin to take on its own, personal, or creative flavor. It will feel authentic, even if the setting or premise has been used before. (That said, if you go and write another book with Elves and Dwarves, I will seriously hunt you down!)

Write about what captivates you, write about the story, the characters; write whatever the fire inside you wants to express! It’s not hard, after writing a plot-draft of some hot new story-idea, to enhance the background (the idea, setting, or world behind the story), using a flaming imagination. It is hard, on the other hand, to try to create the unique idea without the story and without the fire. Logic never was inspiringly creative, although it can lay out a pretty dry set of twists and turns.

This sounds so amazing, so what could possibly be the bad news? Well, getting that deep into a story takes a real effort, one that has to be made whole-heartedly. If all of this proves too much for you, and you can’t stomach the thought of another class on creativity, there is still hope! You can always write another vampire novel!

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

My book is on AMAZON!!!

I just had to share that link with everyone! There are certain times in everyone's life - having a first child, buying a first house, getting a first ticket, maybe a first girlfriend - that are all meant to prepare us for the ultimate accomplishment in life, which is of course, getting a book published! I, unfortunately, haven't experienced a majority of those, which is why I am utterly unable to contain my excitement to any degree of rationality!

In said spirit, I hereby declare this day a national holiday! And of course, you are all invited to celebrate it with me. I would suggest starting off by taking a few minutes to enjoy the weather, if it's nice out, appreciate the value of some of your closest friends and where you'd be without them, maybe treat yourself to a guilty pleasure such as chocolate for you women, or an action movie for you guys. And then once you are warmed up, you should definitely click the link above and visit the site to see the new cover art, and how cool the book looks on Amazon!

Happy celebrations!

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Manuscript Revision

The secret to revision is all in the attitude. And the first step is learning to challenge the basic premise. I have a cousin, after having read my completed manuscripts, who is fond of saying things like, “Why don’t you take the theme and scene structure leading to the climax, and then invert it?" This, obviously, is not the most welcome type of suggestion to one who has spent the past few months writing a several-hundred-page manuscript. The only thing worse, is when the labor-implicit idea rings true, as it almost always does. (If they didn’t, where would the headache come from?)

The second secret is to fear not, thy story is with thee. Perhaps the biggest thing that can stop or stunt our manuscripts in their evolution toward greatness, is our fear that tampering with them will somehow throw off the magical balance we hope they have somehow attained, taking them from the lofty pinnacle of “as good as it can get” and plunging them downward to the depths of “listless mediocrity.” I, however, would suggest that “as good as it can get” and “mediocrity” are actually not that far apart. Most of the difference between the two is caused by wishful thinking on the part of the author. Take that away, a process more painful than pealing scabs, and one will mostly likely reveal a manuscript with high potential and desperate need of revision. Wishing for the manuscript to be great, and hesitancy to touch it will not actually take it there. But fearless revision, and courageous implementation of new, startling ideas, on the other hand, will.

Third, adopt the motto, “He who says it can’t be done is usually interrupted by the guy who just did it.” Don’t be afraid to get out the red pencil or marker, and have at the manuscript like any four-year-old would with that same marker, and his daddy’s business planner. Editors won’t be afraid, so if you don’t mark it up, they WILL!.
Read through the manuscript page by page and flag anything that stands out to you, for whatever reason. You don’t have to know why at the time. Shrugging and letting a phrase or paragraph go unmarked, with the wishful rationalization that it is “probably good enough” or, “no one will probably notice” is basically the same as saying, “mediocrity for me, please, and super-size it!”

“But, what of those picturesque combinations of conversation and poetic supporting detail?” you ask in horror. “Right now, it pierces straight to the heart! How do I react to the heinous suggestion that it isn’t expressive or concise enough?”

Simple. First, take a shot of rubbing alcohol in the eye, and then face the fact that your glorious prose probably doesn’t connect with the reader as strongly as it does to you. If it did, they wouldn’t be suggesting that you strengthen it, or tighten it, or clarify it to some degree. On the bright side, if one can summon the courage to try, to rewrite, he/she will almost always find that the different approach was in fact beneficial to the story’s overall integrity. Instead of bemoaning the pain of change, learn to admit that deep down, that you know they’re right, and then say to yourself that you can do it. Most of my friends who write, have already learned to adopt this attitude. As for myself, I’m still working on it. (No negative comments about revisions to this article, please.)

There are numerous techniques for sparking creativity in the revision process. If I feel charitable, and someday run into a great deal of more time than I have now, I might even list some of them. It is, however, unnecessary, for I have repeatedly seen that revision techniques do nothing without the correct attitude. Make a fresh attack on your manuscript with the approach I’ve mentioned above, and you will discover the techniques for yourself. Your welcome. Anytime.

Friday, November 5, 2010

The Silent Stalker - Update

I finished the first draft in a grand flurry, sometime between midnight and one A.M. this Tuesday. The complete manuscript turned out to be just over 80,000 words, which is perfect, since I was saying from the beginning that it would range from 75 - 80,000 words.

The Manuscript's Current Condition

I put the most thought into the ending, out of any part of the book. The original ending I had planned, turned out being inconsistent under a careful examination. Since that is a pet peeve of mine, that wouldn't do! The end result - my new favorite piece of literature of anything I have ever written! Even though I was still recovering from the flu, the following day was still the best day of the week.

Right now, comprising the second draft, I have a list of things I need to research, implement, or change. For example, during the writing of the book, several character traits emerged on their own, and I need to go and integrate them into the first half of the manuscript as well. Also, I have a list of scenes that need to be changed. For a first draft, I'm pleasantly surprised, but that doesn't mean it doesn't still need a fair amount of work.

The second draft will be MUCH quicker than usual - several times quicker than the one I did for Vengeance, which added almost 50,000 words to it's completed word count. I expect to make good headway on it, and be done in a matter of weeks. Then, I promise, I will finish Vengeance.

Writing query letters

If injustices happen in the writing world, I personally think that at least 90% of them have to do with query letters—writing query letters, depending on query letters, or just the fact that they exist at all. Professors and classroom teachers will gladly tell you the basics that haven’t worked for them either—1 inch margins, white paper with brightness of 100, standard font, personal information in the top left corner, research and mention the publishing house’s interests and policies, etc.

And of course, there are always the "don’ts"—don’t go over one page, don’t beg, don’t send your manuscript until they request it, don’t try to be clever or do something unique like adding illustrations or handmade doodles, no tear drops or food stains on the page, don’t bad-talk your abilities, etc. Don’t, don’t, don’t!

But let’s take a realistic look at this. So you’ve just spent the last ten months working every kink and flaw out of your manuscript which now boarders more closely on perfection than Michael Jordan shooting hoops, and you’re proud of it, as well you should be. It has a unique idea you’re just sure will hit the big time. So you spend all of ten minutes, or even ten days, on your query letter, knowing that months, or even years worth of work will now be represented by whatever you can fit on one page. Query letters not your thing? But writing is? Tough!

Your manuscript, worth more than gold, will now be judged completely off its query letter, which, following the "do’s" of conformity, and the "don’ts" of originality, will blend in seamlessly with the thousands of other query letters pilling up in virtually every editor’s office. Inspiring, isn’t it? (The point is, you need more than just well put words on the page…most of the time, because the evaluation system isn’t fair.)

It’s like getting all the greatest long-distance runners and awarding the golden prize to whoever can hold their breath the longest. But why do I need to be telling you that? If you were one of the three people this year who got signed using query letters, you certainly wouldn’t be reading this!

So what is the answer, then? Connections. Establishing contacts eliminates the need to shoot in the dark. You can then send your query, or future manuscript proposal, with a much higher return rate. First time authors need a claim to fame, or at least authenticity. Second time authors too. Third time authors? They already have enough claim, and more importantly, connections.

My advice is, get something to show for yourself that will add weight to your query letter. You want it to slam the editor’s hand down, when he/she picks it up, and not let him/her get out from under it until he/she’s agreed and promised to contact you. For example, get a website, get a blog, publish a few articles, put up your short stories or even long ones online for people to look at (the internet’s still free.) Better yet, get a book published, even if you have to do it through joint venture, or print on demand publishing.

The good news is, you can do it! Three people a year is more than none, and if you have something to show for yourself, then maybe they’ll look at the actual manuscript.

How To Be An Author - Introduction

There are so many things to be learned when entering a career of writing. Challenges, obstacles, and such lie around (and in front of) every corner. Many lose heart before the journey is through—some before it ever started.

But fear not, as good news is here! For those who are authors, and those who wish to be authors, this bold, decisive statement of ultimate importance will make all the difference: The world of being a writer is just as glamorous, exciting, and every bit as fulfilling as rumor makes it out to be. That is, of course, made possible by the fact that it doesn’t exist. But what good are fictitious creations if we can’t say with certainty that they are, in fact, just as we created them? And why would we want to create a world so vivid unless we could use it to eat our hearts out, or to convince others that it’s actually the world we live in? (The possibilities are literally endless!)

There is a reason why 90% of all fiction books published never sell more than a thousand copies. There’s also a reason why this race is such a dangerous, risky one to get into. With social media mutating the rules like Darwin’s theory on steroids, and the demands on authors accelerating beyond breaking point, getting established and acquiring a fan base requires more than just one or two strong points - it requires a broad understanding of the entire process, time, devotion, originality, and a cool slogan like, “Rights for one-celled organisms!”
Having your friends invite their friends to join you on facebook and myspace just doesn’t cut it. (Although it does help. Like, it really helps a lot.) (No seriously…it really helps a ton!)

This flyer series of lectures will briefly cover each of the various elements of writing, from drafting query letters to handling immense fame. Hopefully, you’ll learn most of what NOT to do. (I assure you that anything you actually learn TO do is merely coincidental, and the author is not responsible.)

Until next week, remember: Our luck at something completely depends at how much work we put into it. (And you always wanted to know why some guys have so much luck with girls…)

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

The Stalker Murders - Novel Introduction

This manuscript came as much surprise to me as it probably is to you. Yes, I know I haven’t yet finished my upcoming release VENGEANCE. Yes, I know I've now started two different trilogies that need to be finished. And yes, I know this is going to start getting confusing soon. I would just like to cite the writer’s fourth amendment: The right to bear and use moderate amounts of eccentricity.

I will finish VENGEANCE, I promise! I was simply minding my own business, preparing to do just that, when ideas from an old plot began tempting me to dig it up and resurrect it. Before I knew what was happening, these ideas began multiplying inside my mind, building pressure until they exploded. The fruit, as of now, is a partially completed manuscript, nearing 150 pages.

So far, this has been a decidedly different novel in just about every area. I didn’t ask for it to be that way, but I couldn’t refuse it either. Previous novels have flown together incredibly fast. In two, to two and a half months, the first draft is done, exceeding 100,000 words. They taught me that consistency is key. Just put in an hour a day, and before you know it, the book is done.

Part of this consistency and speed, however, could be due to my having written them during periods of my life where I was able to dedicate a majority of my waking thought toward their completion. Now however, that is not the case. Were I to post a blog during the day, it would say something like, “Another uneventful day of work.”

The writing has come in spurts. Many days, I’m too mentally exhausted to do much of anything, let alone write an acidically suspenseful novel. Other days, however, the writing comes in spurts, such that the majority of the night has gone by before I manage to write down the unending stream of details flooding my mind. So much for consistency.

You can see more of the technical details about it on my Other Projects page on my website.

Feel free to comment or ask questions. Once the novel gets closer to completion, I'll open an FAQ for it.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Take it step by step

The above motto is good advice for lots of situations - tight ropes, marketing, changing diapers, learning to use blogs, etc. But it is also a very good approach to changes in lifestyle, or when undertaking massive projects. For example, I now have elected myself as the life-source for two blogs and a website. Why I did that, I'm not sure.

However, until further investigation can shed some light on it, I'll just assume that I had a reason. And, taking it step by step, I have actually been blessed with some ideas. For example, as soon as I finish this post, I'm going to set out to make another page for this blog, entitled, "How to be an Author."

This is the exciting news! I'm going to send out bits and pieces of it on facebook, but the actual, complete posts are going to be here. I am going to shoot for one per week, but we'll see how crazy things get. The idea, is that they will teach people everything they need to know about being an author...too good to be true, right?

It certainly is! They'll probably teach people more about how NOT to be an author, but that's fine for me. Anytime a mock-article teaches one SOMETHING, it's doing alright.

Alright, enough gab. I was proud of myself for figuring out how to make this post. Now lets see if I can add a page...

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Welcome to my site!

Well, this is day one of delving into the wonderful world of Blogging. For now, it officially rocks! This site is blowing me away with how customizable it is! And the new St. George weather is also blowing me away--or trying to melt me. Goodness! It's hot! Even with AC! And I thought I'd be getting away from it when I left Nashville a couple weeks ago. Maybe I'll just have to face the fact that I'm not much of a heat-lover.