Thursday, May 26, 2016

Ultimate Bucket-List - 5 Reasons To Write A Book

(Every man should) plant a tree, have a child, and write a book. These all live on after us, insuring a measure of immortality.





We’ve all heard the old adage of semi-obscure origin. Over the years it has evolved and grown.  Some versions it include the marrying of a spouse and building a house.  (Nowadays, we would probably change the building part to a more leisurely visiting of them in Parade of Homes.)  But the premise has always been the same - the Ultimate Bucket-list.


First of all, I think we should accept that whoever started said that probably didn’t have wifi. Thankfully, modern technology has sped up our lives enough that we no longer need a growing tree in the backyard for a source of entertainment.


Seriously, though, each of these three ultimate bucket-list items has incredible merit.  My two points today are simply, 1) It says something that writing a book could rank in the top three, and 2) Writing a book is the best alternative of the lot.  


Here’s why:


1)  Planting a Tree Takes Time.  Yeah, yeah, good things take time and great things do not come easily.  I get it!  You get what you pay for!  But I’m just lazy enough to do a quick cost-benefit analysis in my head and come up somewhat less motivated.  


And before the rosy, picturesque image of planting a small seed and reaping a beautiful backyard paradise makes you angry at me, let me tell you a story.  My dad had exactly that vision.  Almost every year, for my entire childhood, he set out cultivate our front yard.  He planted trees.  He planted lots of trees.  He sprouted them from neighboring trees and even freighted them in from the nearest nursery, on the far side of the state.  He brought in potting soil by the ton, dug holes, buried water lines, planted grass, put in a sidewalk, and built fences.


He never quite got the “neat and tidy” american front yard, though - with the smooth, dark green grass and inviting shade from towering trees.  At its closest point, the backyard approximated the african jungle more closely than anything.  Not the trees, though.  Oh, no.  The trees died.  I’m talking about the giant, thorny tumbleweeds that responded to his nurturing efforts by eating up the lawn and growing nearly as high as his hopes for the dead trees.


In retrospect, someone should have told him either not to put his house in the heart of not-even-cacti-grow-here Nevada, or to take up dry landscaping.  


My father’s tireless efforts weren’t entirely without rewards, however.  On possibly the best summer day of my life, after being bested at every level by the manic tumbleweed forest, he literally let me take a flamethrower to it.


Bottom line, writing a book is never going to take that long.  Even if it doesn’t turn out as you hope, you’ll know a lot sooner.  Then you can put it on a shelf somewhere and have it to look back on, without ever once worrying that it is secretly sprouting thorns and growing out of control.


2) Having a Baby Isn’t a Pastime. Don’t get me wrong, having kids is a life-changing experience on nearly every level.  It’s just that after we have them, we spend the next twenty years fighting against, and trying to undo those changes.  And...yes...as a father, I am forced to admit there is nothing more important or rewarding.  But having babies, in my mind, always seemed like it belonged in the “Top 5 Unavoidable Milestones” list.


Take a novel for example.  It too takes time and nurturing.  You get to see it grow and mature.  In a very real sense, it is also “your baby.”  But if you get a headache, it will stay quiet.  If you need a break, it won't go "Emo" on you.  It doesn’t generate one metric ton of crap per year and the only time it wakes you at night is when it just gave you an epiphany.


Nobody says things like, “You know, I’m just still so young, with so much life to live!  I think I’ll wait until I’m in my early forties to write a book.”  Yet most people have babies and few of them write books. Point is, we bring enough responsibility and head-ache on ourselves. Writing is actually fun!


3) Writing is Imagination on Steroids.  Now that we’ve taken care of the competition, let’s take a better look at writing.  Almost anyone who reads a book, and then watches the movie, inevitably replies, “The movie was great, but not as good as the book.”  You’ve been there, right?  Why was that?  Because when we read, we invest our imaginations, and that is inherently a rewarding experience for us as a species.  


But if you think that reading is a trip, you should try writing!  In 2014 I finally got up the courage to write Tribes: The Beastman  and it’s sequel Tribes: Celestia, an idea I first created in 2007.  To my surprise, I could remember nearly every, character, plot point and location in great detail, as bright and vividly as though I’d thought them up the day before.  I believe that occurrence is common with most writers.  We really give a piece of ourselves to its creation.  No life is more deeply touched by the finished work, than the author.


4) Writing is Great Self-Expression.  We all need it, know it or not.  Writing, (and I’m being serious here) is one of the greatest therapists of all time.  I, myself, have written several stories to help cope with a tragic event or another.  (No, these stories have not, nor will they ever be seen by human eye.)  If you feel overwhelmed, imprisoned to past emotions, or misunderstood, give it a try.


5) Finishing is a Rush.  I thought it fitting to save this point for last.  Like any project, finishing a novel, being able to type, “THE END”, close it, and know that therein lie emotions, living characters, and a compelling story of your own making, is probably one of the single-greatest feelings that I have ever felt.  As invigorating as it is to write and create, it is equally as satisfying to reap closure.

And, as an added bonus (much like how this could have been a sixth point), once it is done, you get to pick it up occasionally and relive the perfect story again and again.

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Captain America - Civil War: Was it's plot disappointing?

It is a very positive thing for Marvel that the arguments around Captain America - Civil War, tend to range from "the best Marvel movie ever" to "somewhere in the top five."  I would challenge anyone to make an honest case as to why it shouldn't be in one of those two categories.

First of all, the movie is tight, fast, and full of endearing character moments.  It came much closer in scope to The Avengers, than it did a stand-alone super hero movie.  I didn't do the math, but I would be willing to bet that Civil War sports a more numerous hero line-up than the first Avengers did.  Add that draw to the strong performances of nearly every actor involved, and you already have a home-run.  But Civil War also offers possibly the best super-hero action ever put on screen.  And don't forget about an appearance from spiderman that will leave one possibly even more anxious for Spiderman Homecoming ever!

I can, however, see three reasons why some fans felt it slipping from a coveted "Best. Movie. Ever." position in their hearts.  Note:  As I will be discussing plot points, as the central material of this post, prepare yourselves for spoilers.

First, the plot.  To be fair, super-hero movies in general aren't known for their incredibly unique and thought-provoking subject matter.  And here, they've managed to use directing and story telling techniques quite effectively, to hide the movie's simple premise under a guise of mystery, but it does basically boil down to a villain seeking revenge for the loss of his family.  Not exactly a real page-turner.

But I bought it, and here's why:  Civil War wasn't out to sell the villain, as was it's chronologic predecessor, Age of Ultron.  It was selling a conflict between the super-heroes that we already know, and that premise bought up a majority of screen time.  Mission accomplished.  The faint hint of mystery, and even the apparently anti-climactic final play of the villain, actually fulfilled it's purpose, in my eyes, which was to pit the title characters against each other.

Second, the subject matter.  In my estimation, the studio and directors did everything that could be humanly done to maintain a fun, adventurous tone, despite the obvious, central themes.  When I first heard of Civil War, two or three years ago, my first reaction was, "Iron Man, no!  He's the best part!  I don't know if I'll even watch this one!"  I imagined several scenarios in my head, but ultimately kept ending up with Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith.  It didn't matter how fun the first half was, the final act had to be a downer.

However, unlike Anakin Skywalker, Robert Downey Jr. was able to push through enough redeeming characteristics in his hardened, guilt-motivated character, that it actually kept me (nearly) torn between sides.  So as I said, downer subject material; absolute best that could be done - still a fun show.

Third, the ending.  It didn't actually feel like an ending at all.  It felt more like the movie had to take a two-year commercial break.  As it stood, thanks to the last five minutes, none of the characters saw any real consequences for any of their actions.  Also, the feud between Iron man and Captain America ended on a fuzzy note.  At times throughout the films playing, their conflict hit very clear, precise notes.  But the very ending left me asking myself, "So, they're...kind of...okay, then?"

In short, no final consequences were seen in this movie.  In any good story, we follow a cause-and-effect relationship of events.  It's the final "events" that give us the sense of closure at the end of a story.  So by that criteria, this movie really didn't have enough closure to serve as the main course.

But was that even the purpose?  They call it the "Marvel Cinematic Universe" for a reason.  The one thing that Marvel can do that sets it almost entirely apart from any other franchise, is to give us that sense of continuation.  In my opinion, Civil War was never meant to be a "one and done" storyline.  It was supposed to build the universe and act as a catalyst to the broader storyline.  If you look at it by itself, it may feel incomplete.  But if you look at it in the overall arch of the MCU, it fits into place much better.

Personally, I'm not putting it up for the best ever, but thanks to the we spend with Ironman, mentoring Spiderman, I would put it at a close second.

What did I miss?  Was I completely off on a point, or all of it?  I'd love to hear your thoughts on this!